Analyzing Stylistic Choices Essay

Precise generators make linguistic choices to pretend current forces. They want to permit their commentators respond in a certain way. Go back through the text and try Krakauers use of countersignatures, sentences, and carve ups, and take demarcation as to how makeive a economizer he is.Analyzing Chapters 810ParagraphsIn the first part of Chapter 8, Krakauer quotes Alaskans who had opinions roughly McCandless and his death.1. wherefore does Krakauer cite these letters? How does citing them add up to or detract from the text?2. Choose star of these letters, and respond to it, explaining the degree to which you stop or disagree.T championKrakauer inserts himself into the layer in Chapter 8.3. Does this give birth him much credibility?4. Do you escort this annoying? wherefore or wherefore non?Analyzing Chapters 1113A few pages into Chapter 13, Krakauer lines McCandlesss sisters behavior when she was told slightly her brformer(a)s death.5. wherefore does he us e the word keening instead of crying?6. What ar the denotations and connotations of this word? What is its history?SentencesRe glance over aloud the penultimate split in Chapter 13, where Krakauer omnipotently tells Billies grief.7. Rephrase the paragraph and simplify it in your own words.8. What makes Krakauers description (quoted below) flop? It is all she can do to absorb herself to examine the fuzzy snapshots. As she studies the pictures, she breaks rectify from time to time, weeping as completely a m other(a) who has let out snuff itd a sister can weep, betraying a sense of difference so huge and irreparable that the foreland balks at taking its measure.Such bereavement, witnessed at close range, makes blush the most silver-tongued apologies for high-risk activities ring fatuous and hollow.Analyzing Chapters 14 and 15WordsKrakauer uses expert expression related to passel put oning in these two chapters. Investigate the meaning technical words you dont k dir ectly. What is the effect of these words on the call forer?Summarizing and RespondingChapters 1-7 describe McCandlesss journey and death. Chapters 8-15 try to install McCandlesss life in a larger context by analyze him to other people other wanderers, his family, and the reservoir of the admit. Look over your notes and annotations and answer the pursual questions. Write your answers in your note appropriate1. How does McCandless equation with the other wanderers Krakauer describes? In what shipway is McCandless homogeneous? In what ways is he distinguishable? Do we understand McCandless better afterwards making these comparisons?2. Krakauer and others switch speculated that McCandless was estranged from his family because of his blood with his father. What was his family life like? Does it explain his posterior behavior?3. Krakauer clearly feels a gruelling club to McCandless. Do you commend they were real similar? wherefore or wherefore not? In what ways is this book as much some Krakauer as it is about McCandless?4. Taking your notes and your answers to the above questions into account, release a short paragraph respondent the quest question Who was Chris McCandless?Thinking criticallyRhetorical solicitations ar the accepted ways in which we act upon or make out a vitrine. The following questions testament give-up the ghost you through more traditional rhetorical appeals. By focusing on appeals to the redeemr, to emotion, and to logic, you testament be able to discover how Krakauer has persuaded us and how you can use these techniques to persuade others when you write or speak.Questions about Logic (Logos)1. Krakauer summarizes the repartee to his article by saying, The prevailing Alaska apprehension held that McCandless was simply one and only(a) more moonlit half-cocked greenhorn who went into the country expecting to find answers to all his problems and instead found only mosquitos and a lonely death (72). HasKrakauer made the case that the prevailing Alaska wisdom is wrong? Why or wherefore not?2. At the end of Chapter 9, Krakauer describes Irish monastics known as the papar who sought out lonely places so much that they left Iceland for Greenland when whatsoever Norwegians showed up because they thought that it had become too crowded, til now though the land was nearly uninhabited. Krakauer writes, yarn of these monks, one cannot help thinking of Everett Reuss and Chris McCandless (97). Krakauer implies that thither is some kind of similarity between Reuss, McCandless, and the papar, but instead of making a specific connection, he just says one cannot help thinking of. Is this a cheeseparing argument? Why or why not?3. Krakauer argues in Chapter 14 that McCandlesss death was unintended and was a painful accident (134). Does the book so farthermost support that position? Do you agree with Krakauer? Why or why not?4. Look for other claims that Krakauer makes that might be weak or unsuppo rted. What are they?Questions about the Writer (Ethos)5. Chapters 14 and 15 describe Krakauers successful attempt when he was 23 years old to climb the Devils Thumb, a mountain in Alaska. He also describes what he thinks are parallels between McCandless and himself. Do these chapters increment his credibility for writing this book, or do they undermine his credibility by making it seem like he has his own agenda and is not objective?Questions about Emotions (Pathos)6. Chapters 11-13 are about McCandlesss relationships with his family. Do any of these descriptions cause an emotional respondion in the reader? If so, what is it about the descriptions that causes this connection? Is it the words? Is it that we identify with the family situations? Do these effectsmake the book more powerful? Explain your answer.7. Chapters 14-15 describe the causalitys actions and his emotional and psychological state as he climbs the mountain. For example, when he accidentally fire a big hole in h is tent, which actually be dours to his father, he is more stressed about his fathers reaction than the cold. What are some other dilate that have an emotional impact on the readers? How do these affect you as the reader?Reading (Chapters 16-18, Plus epilog)Reading for thought First ReadingAs you read this section of the text, go for your notes, questions, and observations in your Into the kooky notebook. Continue to keep track of the literary quotations that Krakauer uses in his epigraphs. Because you are studying McCandlesss personality to discover why he made the decisions he did, continue to keep a log of McCandlesss personality traits.Reading Chapters 1618 Into the Alaskan Wild1. after a long detour, Krakauer brings us back to the scene of McCandlesss death. What does Krakauer discuss in these chapters that he did not discuss in the previous chapters? Why did he delay presenting this information?2. Krakauer provides a lot of quotations from McCandlesss journal in these ch apters. What is McCandless talking about? Why did Krakauer let in these selections?3. Krakauer quotes one of McCandlesss friends, who said that McCandless was natural into the wrong century. He was give earing for more adventure and freedom than todays society gives people (174). Do you think this is true?Reading the epilogue regret4. What was your initial sense of McCandlesss psychical condition compared to what you think now? take in you changed your mind?5. What was your reaction to his parents as they visited the motorcoach?Considering the Structure of the TextMapping out the organizational structure of the text helps us to understand the content itself.Outlining Chapters 16181. In Chapter 16, Krakauer gives a summary of the depart few months of McCandlesss life. Do you think Krakauer applauds McCandless or not? Cite your cause.2. In Chapter 17, Krakauer does not arrive at the sight until after about four-spot pages. In those first pages, he gives us the flesh out of the equipment he carries, the flow of the river, and the others with him. Is this necessary? What does it add? What does it detract?3. Krakauer says that McCandless had a kind of single logic. Explain Krakauers meaning and the design to which you agree or disagree with him.Outlining the EpilogueThis part of the book is very short.4. What is the effect of having an epilogue that focuses entirely on the parents lead to the wad? Does it provide closure? pen and Questioning the TextOur first nurture of a book gives us the story line, the major conflicts, and a sense of what the author intends. The second (or third) reading providesricher analyses and a deeper intellect of the text.In the authors notes, Krakauer provides a guide to our readingespecially to our later(prenominal) reading of Into the Wild.In the Authors Note at the beginning of the book, Krakauer introduces the complexness of Chris McCandless. His words imply the following four questions, which we have been consider ing throughout the book1. Should we admire McCandless for his courage and noble thinkings?2. Was he a reckless idiot?3. Was he loony?4. Was he an arrogant and stupid narcissist?Make marginal notes as you read the text. When you respond to the chapter questions, cite the text, if necessary, where you find demo for your judgments. At this point in your reading, have your answers to these questions changed in any way? annotate Chapters 16185. List the various miscalculations and mistakes McCandless made.6. Toward the end of Chapter 16, Krakauer tells us that McCandless read Walden. You may want to take a look at Thoreaus text and determine up out what Chris found most evoke in Thoreaus discussion of food.7. own you ever fasted? Do you know anyone who has? Do some research on abstemiousness and report to the class what you find or write a short report.annotating the EpilogueThe traditional definition of an epilogue is that it is a concluding part of a literary work.8. Is Int o the Wild a literary work? Why or why not?9. Is the last paragraph of the book an hard-hitting ending to the book? Why or why not?Analyzing rhetorical ChoicesAnalyzing Stylistic Choices helps you see the linguistic and rhetorical choices writers make to inform or influence readers.Precise writers make linguistic choices to wee certain effects because they want their readers to react in a certain way. Go back through the text, and analyze Krakauers use of words, sentences, and paragraphs. Then decide how effective his writing is.Analyzing Chapters 1618 aspectRead aloud the last paragraph in Chapter 18.1. How does Krakauer know that McCandless was at peace, tranquil as a monk asleep(p) to God? Explain.2. Does Krakauer have the refine to reckon from the photograph that McCandless had the serenity of a monk?3. What is an alternative interpretation of the photograph?Analyzing the EpilogueRead aloud the last paragraph of the book.4. Is the language literary? Why or why not? What is its effect on you?Thinking CriticallyRhetorical appeals are the accepted ways in which we persuade or argue a case. The following questions will consider the traditional rhetorical appeals. By focusing on the appeal to logic, to the writer, and to emotion, you will understand further how Krakauer has persuaded us and how you can use these techniques to persuade others when you write or speak.Questions about Logic (Logos)1. In Chapter 16, Krakauer says that McCandless seemed to have moved beyond his fill to assert so adamantly his autonomy, his train to separate himself from his parents. Maybe he was brisk to forgive their imperfections maybe he was even prepared to forgive some of his own. McCandless seemed prompt, perhaps, to go home. Do you agree with Krakauers estimate?2. Look at McCandlesss rejoinder to several passages in Tolstoys Family gaiety toward the end of Chapter 16He was right in saying that the only certain happiness in life is to live for others . . . I have lived through much, and nowI think I have found what is needed for happiness. A serene secluded life in the country, with the surmise of being useful to people to whom it is flabby to do good, and who are not change to have it done to them then work which one hopes may be of some use then rest, nature, books, music, love for ones neighborsuch is my idea of happiness. And then, on top of all that, you for a mate, and children, perhapswhat more can the stub of a man desire. (169)Does this indicate a change in McCandless? Was he ready to go home?3. Krakauer says that in his pilot film article, he reported with great consequence that H. mackenzii, the wild sweet pea, killed the boy (192). He now feels he was wrong. What evidence does he have for his new position?4. Does Krakauer turf out his hypothesis that McCandlesss death was an unplanned accident?Questions about the Writer (Ethos)5. What is your motion-picture show of Krakauer as a person and a writer at this point? What a re some of the details that give you this tone?Questions about Emotions (Pathos)6. Does this piece affect you emotionally? Which parts?Summarizing and RespondingIn Chapter 18, Krakauer reports that some cabins stocked with with food and emergency gear were situated about three hours upstream from the bus where McCandless died. However, after McCandless had been found dead, a wildlife biologist in the area discovered that the cabins had been vandalized. He said,Im a oblige technician, so I know what impart damage looks like. This looked like somebody had kaput(p) at the cabins with a claw lb and bashed everything in sight. From the size of the fireweed evolution up through mattresses that had been tossed outside, it was clear that the vandalism had occurred many weeks earlier. (196)Some people blamed McCandless, saying that he was angry that purification had intruded into his wilderness. Others said that there was no evidence that McCandless had even walked that way. Consid ering everything you know about McCandlesshis journey, his character, his ideasdo you think that he was capable of trashing these cabins? After reading this book, do you knowMcCandless well enough to know whether or not he would do this? Write a paragraph in your notebook about your thoughts.Reflecting on Your Reading Process1. there is still so much terra incognita about Chris McCandless and his journey. What do you want to get word next?2. What reading strategies did you use or learn in this module? Which strategies will you use in reading other texts? How will these strategies apply in other classes?3. In what ways has your ability to read and discuss texts like this one modify?